OM PRAKASH MAHTO vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ACHINTO SEN — A.B.A./2261/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 5,6,7,9,10,14,BSMR,ACT,33(i)(a),41,IF,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010129822026

Filing Number

A.B.A./8367/2026

Filing Date

18-Apr-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./2261/2026

Registration Date

24-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

FOREST ( 137 )

Sub-Category

Indian Forest Act ,1927 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 5,6,7,9,10,14,BSMR,ACT,33(i)(a),41,IF,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.OM PRAKASH MAHTO

    Adv. ABHAY KISHORE,KAMDEO PANDEY,KAMDEO PANDEY, ,RIDHI PANDEY,KAMDEO PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ACHINTO SEN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed Om Prakash Mahto's petition as withdrawn on 07.05.2026, after his counsel sought permission to withdraw and file a regular bail application instead in the underlying forest case pending before the trial court. The court granted liberty to file the bail application before the trial court, which will decide it independently without prejudice to this order, with the State offering no objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./2261/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed Om Prakash Mahto's petition as withdrawn on 07.05.2026, after his counsel sought permission to withdraw and file a regular bail application instead in the underlying forest case pending before the trial court. The court granted liberty to file the bail application before the trial court, which will decide it independently without prejudice to this order, with the State offering no objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case