MANOJ BHUIYAN vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA — JHHC10129732026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010129732026

Filing Number

A.B.A./8358/2026

Filing Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANOJ BHUIYAN

    Adv. ABHAY KR CHATURVEDY,RAJESH KR SINGH,RAJESH KR SINGH, ,CHANDAN KUMAR,KUMAR NISHANT,HADISH ANSARI,RAJESH KR SINGH

  2. 2.MUKESH GANJHU

  3. 3.PINTU BHUIYAN

  4. 4.TETAR BHUIYAN

  5. 5.MUNSI BHUIYAN ALIAS CHARKU BHUIYAN

  6. 6.SONU BHUIYAN

  7. 7.INDRADEO BHUIYAN

  8. 8.ADITYA GANJHU

  9. 9.PRABHU BHUIYAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand ignored defect no.25 in the Sessions Judge's order, which involved an inadvertent typographical error citing Section 30 instead of Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act. The Court found the error was merely technical since Section 33 was correctly cited in the substantive portion of the order. The case was directed to proceed further according to normal procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Lawazima

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand ignored defect no.25 in the Sessions Judge's order, which involved an inadvertent typographical error citing Section 30 instead of Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act. The Court found the error was merely technical since Section 33 was correctly cited in the substantive portion of the order. The case was directed to proceed further according to normal procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case