RAJESH HANSDA @ RAJESH HANSDAK vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SURAJ DEO MUNDA — B.A./3721/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2),317(5),3(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 04th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010129662026
Filing Number
B.A./8351/2026
Filing Date
17-Apr-2026
Registration No
B.A./3721/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJESH HANSDA @ RAJESH HANSDAK
Adv. RAHUL RANJAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SURAJ DEO MUNDA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: B.A. 3721/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Rajesh Hansda, accused in a theft case involving 29 solar panels from Panchayat Lagala. The court ordered his release on a Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties, considering his prolonged custody since October 2025, absence from the FIR, and a co-accused's prior bail grant for similar charges, subject to conditions including cooperation with trial and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
28-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3721/2026
Case Summary: B.A. 3721/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Rajesh Hansda, accused in a theft case involving 29 solar panels from Panchayat Lagala. The court ordered his release on a Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties, considering his prolonged custody since October 2025, absence from the FIR, and a co-accused's prior bail grant for similar charges, subject to conditions including cooperation with trial and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts