VIKASH KUMAR GUPTA @ VIKASH KUMAR @ SONU vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VISHWANATH ROY — B.A./3834/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 302,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010129442026
Filing Number
B.A./8338/2026
Filing Date
17-Apr-2026
Registration No
B.A./3834/2026
Registration Date
02-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIKASH KUMAR GUPTA @ VIKASH KUMAR @ SONU
Adv. ANURAG KASHYAP,SUPRIYA DAYAL,SUPRIYA DAYAL, ,KOMAL S.NARAYAN,BHASWAT PRAKASH,SUPRIYA DAYAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VISHWANATH ROY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Vikash Kumar Gupta, accused of murder (IPC Section 302) in connection with the death of Rohit Kumar Ravi, who allegedly died by slipping from a staircase. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary found the charge based on suspicion rather than substantive evidence, noting that eyewitness accounts contradicted the prosecution's theory. The petitioner was released on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties of equal amount, conditioned on cooperation with trial, non-interference with witnesses, and maintaining contact details with the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
17-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3834/2026
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Vikash Kumar Gupta, accused of murder (IPC Section 302) in connection with the death of Rohit Kumar Ravi, who allegedly died by slipping from a staircase. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary found the charge based on suspicion rather than substantive evidence, noting that eyewitness accounts contradicted the prosecution's theory. The petitioner was released on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties of equal amount, conditioned on cooperation with trial, non-interference with witnesses, and maintaining contact details with the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts