ARUN KUMAR RAM vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAKESH KUMAR SINHA — A.B.A./2254/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),117(2),118,352,351(2),190,191(2),192,(3),109,303(2),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010129122026
Filing Number
A.B.A./8322/2026
Filing Date
17-Apr-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./2254/2026
Registration Date
24-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 482 ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARUN KUMAR RAM
Adv. JITENDRA NATH UPADHYAY,HARSHIKHA KUMARI,HARSHIKHA KUMARI, ,RAHUL KUMAR,HARSHIKHA KUMARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAKESH KUMAR SINHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Arun Kumar Ram in case MGM P.S. 180/2025, where he faced charges under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly calling the informant and stating "he is going high." The court found that the substantive allegation of pipe-cutting was against co-accused, Ram had no criminal antecedent, and the allegation against him was minimal, warranting bail. Ram was directed to surrender within two weeks and furnish a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
17-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./2254/2026
The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Arun Kumar Ram in case MGM P.S. 180/2025, where he faced charges under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly calling the informant and stating "he is going high." The court found that the substantive allegation of pipe-cutting was against co-accused, Ram had no criminal antecedent, and the allegation against him was minimal, warranting bail. Ram was directed to surrender within two weeks and furnish a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts