MURARI LAL AGARWAL vs THE UNION OF INDIA THRO THE GENERAL MANAGER Advocate - PRASHANT PALLAV — WPC/3269/2026
Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010129052026
Filing Number
WPC/4584/2026
Filing Date
17-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPC/3269/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Not Available
Coram
Not Available
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )
Sub-Category
Quashing Matter ( 25 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MURARI LAL AGARWAL
Adv. INDRAJIT SINHA, ,KASHISH TIWARY,KAUSHIK CHAKRABORTY,PRADIPTO MITRA,AJAY KUMAR SAH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE UNION OF INDIA THRO THE GENERAL MANAGER Advocate - PRASHANT PALLAV
-
2.THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (LAND MANAGEMENT), RAILWAY BOARD, GOVT. OF INDIA,
-
3.THE CHAIRMAN, RAILWAY BOARD, GOVT. OF INDIA,
-
4.THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER (DRM), SOUTH EASTERN RAILWAY,
-
5.THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL ENGINEER (EAST), SOUTH EASTERN RAILWAY,
-
6.THE ASSISTANT DIVISIONAL ENGINEER-I, SOUTH EASTERN RAILWAY, TATANAGAR,
-
7.THE SENIOR SECTION ENGINEER (LAND), SOUTH EASTERN RAILWAY,
-
8.THE ESTATE OFFICER, SOUTH EASTERN RAILWAY,
Case History
-
09-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jun-2026
Orders
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
-
04-May-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
Case Summary: WPC/3269/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned to 9th June 2026 for final orders. The court directed the Railway respondents to seek instructions on whether they can reallot the shop to petitioner Murari Lal Agarwal, who claims possession through a transfer from the original allottee (which Railways alleges was illegal). Interim relief granted: petitioner cannot be dispossessed pending further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/3269/2026
Case Summary: WPC/3269/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned to 9th June 2026 for final orders. The court directed the Railway respondents to seek instructions on whether they can reallot the shop to petitioner Murari Lal Agarwal, who claims possession through a transfer from the original allottee (which Railways alleges was illegal). Interim relief granted: petitioner cannot be dispossessed pending further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts