RATI GANJHU vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA — A.B.A./2316/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 18,27(A),28,29,30,NDPS,ACT,33,IF,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010128622026

Filing Number

A.B.A./8313/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./2316/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

DRUGS & MEDICINES ( 125 )

Sub-Category

Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 18,27(A),28,29,30,NDPS,ACT,33,IF,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RATI GANJHU

    Adv. BINOD KR DUBEY,NAWIN KUMAR,NAWIN KUMAR, ,HARSH UTSAV,AKRITI APRAJITA,NAWIN KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Rati Ganjhu, aged 61, who faced arrest in connection with alleged poppy cultivation on forest department land under NDPS Act and Indian Forest Act charges. The court found the petitioner had no criminal antecedent and the disputed land belonged to the forest department, thus granting bail on Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, with petitioner directed to surrender within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./2316/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Rati Ganjhu, aged 61, who faced arrest in connection with alleged poppy cultivation on forest department land under NDPS Act and Indian Forest Act charges. The court found the petitioner had no criminal antecedent and the disputed land belonged to the forest department, thus granting bail on Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, with petitioner directed to surrender within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case