SUNDAR LAL MARANDI vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SOMESHWAR ROY — B.A./3866/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 310(2),311,317(3),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 07th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010128382026
Filing Number
B.A./8309/2026
Filing Date
17-Apr-2026
Registration No
B.A./3866/2026
Registration Date
04-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUNDAR LAL MARANDI
Adv. SHIPRA SONAM,BIPIN BIHARI,BIPIN BIHARI, ,PRIYANSHU NILESH,VARUN PRABHAKAR,MUKUL KUMAR SINGH,BHASKAR TRIVEDI,BIPIN BIHARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SOMESHWAR ROY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: B.A. 3866/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted regular bail to Sundar Lal Marandi, accused in a dacoity case involving theft of transformer copper coils, noting he was not named in the FIR and the chargesheet was filed without proper TIP procedures. The court released him on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties of equal amount, imposing conditions requiring cooperation with trial, provision of contact details, and undertaking not to harass witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
29-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3866/2026
Case Summary: B.A. 3866/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted regular bail to Sundar Lal Marandi, accused in a dacoity case involving theft of transformer copper coils, noting he was not named in the FIR and the chargesheet was filed without proper TIP procedures. The court released him on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties of equal amount, imposing conditions requiring cooperation with trial, provision of contact details, and undertaking not to harass witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts