MD SALAM @ MD SALAM ANSARI vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANAT KUMAR JHA — B.A./3678/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,352,BNS. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010128312026

Filing Number

B.A./8302/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Registration No

B.A./3678/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,352,BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD SALAM @ MD SALAM ANSARI

    Adv. SUSHANT KUMAR SINHA,KUMAR UDAYAN,KUMAR UDAYAN, ,KUMAR UDAYAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANAT KUMAR JHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court rejected the bail application of Md. Salam Ansari, who has been in custody since January 14, 2026, in connection with charges under BNS Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, and 352 involving alleged injury to his wife. The court found direct allegations against the petitioner and noted the presence of an eyewitness (the victim's brother-in-law), therefore declining to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3678/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court rejected the bail application of Md. Salam Ansari, who has been in custody since January 14, 2026, in connection with charges under BNS Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, and 352 involving alleged injury to his wife. The court found direct allegations against the petitioner and noted the presence of an eyewitness (the victim's brother-in-law), therefore declining to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case