MAHENDRA YADAV vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KUMAR — WPC/3347/2026

Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010127992026

Filing Number

WPC/4525/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPC/3347/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LAND ACQUISITION ( 145 )

Sub-Category

RENT RECEIPT ( 14 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHENDRA YADAV

    Adv. RAKESH KUMAR,GAURAV KAUSHALESH,GAURAV KAUSHALESH, ,GAURAV KAUSHALESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KUMAR

  2. 2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, LATEHAR,

  3. 3.THE LAND REFORMS DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LATEHAR,

  4. 4.THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, LATEHAR,

  5. 5.THE CIRCLE OFFICER, BALUMATH,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    Case Summary: WPC/3347/2026 Mahendra Yadav sought mandamus to compel authorities to issue rent receipts and correct land records (Register-II) for his property in Latehar, which was wrongly registered in the State of Bihar's name, despite a favorable 2017 order in Revenue Case No.529/1992. The High Court of Jharkhand disposed of the petition by directing Yadav to file a fresh representation to the Deputy Commissioner within two weeks, with the Deputy Commissioner required to decide the case within six weeks and comply with the 1992 order if found valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/3347/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPC/3347/2026 Mahendra Yadav sought mandamus to compel authorities to issue rent receipts and correct land records (Register-II) for his property in Latehar, which was wrongly registered in the State of Bihar's name, despite a favorable 2017 order in Revenue Case No.529/1992. The High Court of Jharkhand disposed of the petition by directing Yadav to file a fresh representation to the Deputy Commissioner within two weeks, with the Deputy Commissioner required to decide the case within six weeks and comply with the 1992 order if found valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case