RAJ KUMAR GUPTA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - V.S.SAHAY — Cr.M.P./1354/2026

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 74,75,308(2),351(2),BNS,8,POCSO,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010126892026

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./8223/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

Cr.M.P./1354/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )

Sub-Category

Protection of children from sexual offences Act ( 14 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 74,75,308(2),351(2),BNS,8,POCSO,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJ KUMAR GUPTA

    Adv. ABHAY KR CHATURVEDY,RAJESH KR SINGH,RAJESH KR SINGH, ,ASHISH KUMAR SINHA,HADISH ANSARI,RAJESH KR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - V.S.SAHAY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand allowed Raj Kumar Gupta's petition and quashed the Special Judge's proclamation order under Section 82 Cr.P.C. The court held that the Special Judge committed grave illegality by issuing the proclamation without: (1) recording satisfaction that the accused was absconding/concealing himself, and (2) specifying the time and place for the accused's appearance—both mandatory statutory requirements. The court directed the Special Judge to pass a fresh order in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.M.P./1354/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand allowed Raj Kumar Gupta's petition and quashed the Special Judge's proclamation order under Section 82 Cr.P.C. The court held that the Special Judge committed grave illegality by issuing the proclamation without: (1) recording satisfaction that the accused was absconding/concealing himself, and (2) specifying the time and place for the accused's appearance—both mandatory statutory requirements. The court directed the Special Judge to pass a fresh order in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case