ISHWARI GANJHU vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABIR KUMAR CHATTERJEE alias PRABIR CHATTERJEE — A.B.A./2300/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 18,27(a),28,29,30,NDPS,ACT,33,IF,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010126842026

Filing Number

A.B.A./8221/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./2300/2026

Registration Date

27-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

DRUGS & MEDICINES ( 125 )

Sub-Category

Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 18,27(a),28,29,30,NDPS,ACT,33,IF,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ISHWARI GANJHU

    Adv. ABHAY KR CHATURVEDY,RAJESH KR SINGH,RAJESH KR SINGH, ,ASHISH KUMAR SINHA,HADISH ANSARI,KUMAR NISHANT,CHANDAN KUMAR,RAJESH KR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABIR KUMAR CHATTERJEE alias PRABIR CHATTERJEE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Ishwari Ganjhu, who was facing NDPS Act charges for allegedly cultivating poppy plants on forest land. The court found that the petitioner had no criminal antecedents and that the land belonged to the Forest Department, not the petitioner, warranting bail on a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./2300/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Ishwari Ganjhu, who was facing NDPS Act charges for allegedly cultivating poppy plants on forest land. The court found that the petitioner had no criminal antecedents and that the land belonged to the Forest Department, not the petitioner, warranting bail on a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case