RAUSHAN KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJNEESH VARDHAN — A.B.A./2306/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 308(3),308(4),BNS,17,CLA,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010126832026
Filing Number
A.B.A./8220/2026
Filing Date
16-Apr-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./2306/2026
Registration Date
27-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAUSHAN KUMAR
Adv. ABHAY KR CHATURVEDY,RAJESH KR SINGH,RAJESH KR SINGH, ,ASHISH KUMAR SINHA,HADISH ANSARI,KUMAR NISHANT,ARPANA PRIYADARSHINI,CHANDAN KUMAR,RAJESH KR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJNEESH VARDHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed Raushan Kumar's anticipatory bail application (A.B.A. No. 2306/2026) as withdrawn on 08.05.2026, pertaining to Herhang P.S. Case No. 34 of 2024. The petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with liberty to file a regular bail application before the trial court, which the State did not oppose. The court granted this withdrawal and clarified that any subsequent regular bail application shall be decided on merits without prejudice to this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
16-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./2306/2026
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed Raushan Kumar's anticipatory bail application (A.B.A. No. 2306/2026) as withdrawn on 08.05.2026, pertaining to Herhang P.S. Case No. 34 of 2024. The petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with liberty to file a regular bail application before the trial court, which the State did not oppose. The court granted this withdrawal and clarified that any subsequent regular bail application shall be decided on merits without prejudice to this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts