AMIR RASHID ALIAS MD AAMIR RASHID ANSARI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHWETA SINGH — A.B.A./2257/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 308(2),189(1),115(2),117(2),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010126702026
Filing Number
A.B.A./8213/2026
Filing Date
16-Apr-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./2257/2026
Registration Date
24-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 482 ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMIR RASHID ALIAS MD AAMIR RASHID ANSARI
Adv. DURGA C. MISHRA,ABHIJEET ANAND,ABHIJEET ANAND, ,ABHIJEET ANAND
-
2.AKRAM KHAN ALIAS MD AKRAM
-
3.SAHABAJ KHAN ALIAS MD SHARBAJ KHAN ALIAS MD SHAHBAJ KHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHWETA SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
Case Summary: A.B.A. 2257/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners facing charges of demanding extortion (Rangdari) for liquor and assault under BNS 2023 sections 308(2), 189(1), 115(2), and 117(2). The court found the allegations warranted bail, noting injuries were simple, no extortion amount was specified, and a co-accused had already received anticipatory bail. Each petitioner must furnish Rs.25,000 bond with two sureties and surrender within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
16-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./2257/2026
Case Summary: A.B.A. 2257/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners facing charges of demanding extortion (Rangdari) for liquor and assault under BNS 2023 sections 308(2), 189(1), 115(2), and 117(2). The court found the allegations warranted bail, noting injuries were simple, no extortion amount was specified, and a co-accused had already received anticipatory bail. Each petitioner must furnish Rs.25,000 bond with two sureties and surrender within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts