RANJAN KUMAR vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ANURADHA SAHAY — B.A./3715/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 309(6),BNS. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010126622026

Filing Number

B.A./8208/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

B.A./3715/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 309(6),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RANJAN KUMAR

    Adv. MANISH YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ANURADHA SAHAY

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: B.A. No. 3715/2026 Ranjan Kumar's bail application was not decided on merits. The court found that his regular bail prayer had been previously rejected on 12.03.2026 by Justice Ananda Sen. Following precedent, the case was adjourned with directions to the Registry to place the matter before the Chief Justice for listing before the appropriate bench, as successive bail applications must go to the original bench regardless of roster changes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3715/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: B.A. No. 3715/2026 Ranjan Kumar's bail application was not decided on merits. The court found that his regular bail prayer had been previously rejected on 12.03.2026 by Justice Ananda Sen. Following precedent, the case was adjourned with directions to the Registry to place the matter before the Chief Justice for listing before the appropriate bench, as successive bail applications must go to the original bench regardless of roster changes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case