YAMUNA PRAJAPATI vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAKESH KUMAR SINHA — B.A./3825/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 302,201,34,IPC,03/04,PWC,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010126442026

Filing Number

B.A./8191/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

B.A./3825/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )

Sub-Category

Prevention of Witch(DAAIN) Practices Act ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 302,201,34,IPC,03/04,PWC,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YAMUNA PRAJAPATI

    Adv. NAWIN KUMAR,PRAMENDRA KUMAR MEHTA,PRAMENDRA KUMAR MEHTA, ,PRAMENDRA KUMAR MEHTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAKESH KUMAR SINHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Yamuna Prajapati's bail application in a murder case (IPC Sections 302, 201, 34 and Prevention of Witch Craft Act, 2003/04), despite arguments that a key witness turned hostile and no eyewitness exists, citing the seriousness of charges and prior bail rejections. The court directed the State to promptly produce remaining witnesses (8 of 11 still pending examination) before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3825/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Yamuna Prajapati's bail application in a murder case (IPC Sections 302, 201, 34 and Prevention of Witch Craft Act, 2003/04), despite arguments that a key witness turned hostile and no eyewitness exists, citing the seriousness of charges and prior bail rejections. The court directed the State to promptly produce remaining witnesses (8 of 11 still pending examination) before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case