NANKU DAS vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SARDHU MAHTO — B.A./3839/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 80(2),85,89,3(5),BNS,3,4,DP,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010126432026

Filing Number

B.A./8190/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

B.A./3839/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

FAMILY MATTERS ( 132 )

Sub-Category

Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 80(2),85,89,3(5),BNS,3,4,DP,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NANKU DAS

    Adv. JYOTSNA MAHATO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SARDHU MAHTO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: B.A. No. 3839 of 2026 The Jharkhand High Court rejected Nanku Das's bail petition in a dowry death case. Das, accused of abetting his wife's death through dowry harassment and assault, has been in custody since April 2025. The court found direct allegations against him in the FIR and declined bail, but directed the State to expedite remaining witness examinations to conclude the trial promptly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3839/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: B.A. No. 3839 of 2026 The Jharkhand High Court rejected Nanku Das's bail petition in a dowry death case. Das, accused of abetting his wife's death through dowry harassment and assault, has been in custody since April 2025. The court found direct allegations against him in the FIR and declined bail, but directed the State to expedite remaining witness examinations to conclude the trial promptly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case