MS RISHIRAJ HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR RABINDRA KUMAR JHA vs REVENUE DEPARTMENT Advocate - VIKASH KISHORE PRASAD, ,NAGENDRA PATHAK,VAISHNAVI KAUSHIK,PARTH S. A. SWAROOP PATI,MANISH MISHRA,AMIT KR VERMA,GUNENDRA MOHAN MISHRA,GUNENDRA MOHAN MISHRA,GUNENDRA MOHAN MISHRA,GUNENDRA MOHAN MISHRA — WPC/2050/2013

Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 20-Nov-2013

CNR: JHHC010126382013

Filing Number

WPC/8570/2013

Filing Date

22-Mar-2013

Registration No

WPC/2050/2013

Registration Date

23-Mar-2013

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

RENT CONTROL ( 167 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MS RISHIRAJ HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR RABINDRA KUMAR JHA

    Adv. SHANKAR LAL AGARWAL,ABHIJEET KR SINGH,ABHIJEET KR SINGH, ,ABHIJEET KR SINGH,ABHIJEET KR SINGH,ABHIJEET KR SINGH,ABHIJEET KR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.REVENUE DEPARTMENT Advocate - VIKASH KISHORE PRASAD, ,NAGENDRA PATHAK,VAISHNAVI KAUSHIK,PARTH S. A. SWAROOP PATI,MANISH MISHRA,AMIT KR VERMA,GUNENDRA MOHAN MISHRA,GUNENDRA MOHAN MISHRA,GUNENDRA MOHAN MISHRA,GUNENDRA MOHAN MISHRA

  2. 2.The Principal Secretary

  3. 3.Dy Secretary

  4. 4.The Commissioner

  5. 5.Dy Commissioner

  6. 6.Ms Tata Steel Ltd

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    Case Summary: WPC 2050/2013 & WPC 6887/2013 Court Decision: The Jharkhand High Court dismissed both writ petitions filed by Rishiraj Homes Private Limited and Kaushal Kanchan Construction Pvt. Ltd., rejecting their challenges to land rent and road cess imposed by revenue authorities on sub-leased land in Jamshedpur. Key Reasoning: The court held that the petitioners had accepted the rent fixed by the Appropriate Machinery Committee, paid the amounts, taken possession, and constructed boundary walls before challenging the rent as arbitrary and unauthorized. The dispute involved factual questions outside writ jurisdiction. Additionally, Tata Steel Limited, being a private entity, is not a "State" under Article 12 of the Constitution, so certiorari cannot lie against its letters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  5. 21-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  7. 22-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  8. 03-Oct-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF

  9. 03-Oct-2023

    Final Disposal

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

  10. 02-Aug-2023

    Final Disposal

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

  11. 13-Jul-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF

  12. 13-Jul-2023

    Final Disposal

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

  13. 15-Jun-2023

    Final Disposal

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

  14. 03-May-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF

  15. 03-May-2023

    Final Disposal

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  16. 15-Mar-2023

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF

  17. 11-Sep-2019

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  18. 04-Sep-2019

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  19. 28-Aug-2019

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  20. 21-Aug-2019

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  21. 14-Aug-2019

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  22. 07-Aug-2019

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  23. 31-Jul-2019

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  24. 24-Jul-2019

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  25. 17-Jul-2019

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  26. 10-Jul-2019

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  27. 20-Nov-2013

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 22-Mar-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/2050/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPC 2050/2013 & WPC 6887/2013 Court Decision: The Jharkhand High Court dismissed both writ petitions filed by Rishiraj Homes Private Limited and Kaushal Kanchan Construction Pvt. Ltd., rejecting their challenges to land rent and road cess imposed by revenue authorities on sub-leased land in Jamshedpur. Key Reasoning: The court held that the petitioners had accepted the rent fixed by the Appropriate Machinery Committee, paid the amounts, taken possession, and constructed boundary walls before challenging the rent as arbitrary and unauthorized. The dispute involved factual questions outside writ jurisdiction. Additionally, Tata Steel Limited, being a private entity, is not a "State" under Article 12 of the Constitution, so certiorari cannot lie against its letters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case