MUKUL ANAND TOPPO vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - FAHAD ALLAM — A.B.A./2237/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 69,BNS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010126252026

Filing Number

A.B.A./8172/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./2237/2026

Registration Date

23-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 482 ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 69,BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUKUL ANAND TOPPO

    Adv. RAJ,MD. QAISER IQUBAL KHAN,MD. QAISER IQUBAL KHAN, ,SAMAVESH BHANJ DEO,RITU KUMAR,MD. QAISER IQUBAL KHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - FAHAD ALLAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Mukul Anand Toppo, who faced arrest under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly establishing a relationship under false marriage pretenses. The court found that the petitioner and informant had a six-year consensual relationship with multiple meetings before the FIR was filed on 04.02.2026, and prima facie the conduct appeared consensual in nature. The petitioner was directed to surrender within three weeks and release on bail of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./2237/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Mukul Anand Toppo, who faced arrest under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly establishing a relationship under false marriage pretenses. The court found that the petitioner and informant had a six-year consensual relationship with multiple meetings before the FIR was filed on 04.02.2026, and prima facie the conduct appeared consensual in nature. The petitioner was directed to surrender within three weeks and release on bail of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case