VIJAY KUMAR vs THE STATE OFJHARKHAND Advocate - VANDANA BHARTI — B.A./3830/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 317(5),274,275,292,281,125(A),125(B),324(4),3(5),BNS,47(a),EXCISE,ACT63,65,C,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010125662026
Filing Number
B.A./8156/2026
Filing Date
15-Apr-2026
Registration No
B.A./3830/2026
Registration Date
02-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CUSTOM & EXCISE ( 122 )
Sub-Category
Excise (malt Liquors) Act,1890 ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIJAY KUMAR
Adv. SONAL PANDEY,NILESH KUMAR,NILESH KUMAR, ,PRIYANKA AGRAWAL,AYUSH KUMAR VERMA,SONAL SODHANI,NILESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OFJHARKHAND Advocate - VANDANA BHARTI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to 22-year-old Vijay Kumar, accused of illegal foreign liquor trafficking and related offenses under BNS 2023, Excise Act, and Copyright Act. The court ordered his release on a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, imposing conditions that he cooperate with trial, provide contact details, and not intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
28-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3830/2026
The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to 22-year-old Vijay Kumar, accused of illegal foreign liquor trafficking and related offenses under BNS 2023, Excise Act, and Copyright Act. The court ordered his release on a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, imposing conditions that he cooperate with trial, provide contact details, and not intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts