UMESH SINGH CHOUDHARY vs THE STATE OFJHARKHAND Advocate - LILY SAHAY — A.B.A./2334/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2),4/21,MMDR,ACT,7/9/13,JMPIMTSR. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010125382026

Filing Number

A.B.A./8144/2026

Filing Date

15-Apr-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./2334/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MINES AND MINERALS ( 151 )

Sub-Category

Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development)Act 1957 ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2),4/21,MMDR,ACT,7/9/13,JMPIMTSR

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UMESH SINGH CHOUDHARY

    Adv. MUKESH BIHARI LAL,RAJIV KUMAR KARAN,RAJIV KUMAR KARAN, ,RAY RAJAT NATH,AVILASH KUMAR,RAJIV KUMAR KARAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OFJHARKHAND Advocate - LILY SAHAY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed Umesh Singh Choudhary's petition as withdrawn with liberty to re-file before the trial court. The petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition to pursue the matter relying on Supreme Court precedent in *Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI*, which the State did not oppose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./2334/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed Umesh Singh Choudhary's petition as withdrawn with liberty to re-file before the trial court. The petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition to pursue the matter relying on Supreme Court precedent in *Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI*, which the State did not oppose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case