MD SAFDAR QURAISHI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABIR KUMAR CHATTERJEE alias PRABIR CHATTERJEE — A.B.A./2267/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 2(1),12(2),12(3),JBAPS,ACT,11,PCA,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010124662026
Filing Number
A.B.A./8098/2026
Filing Date
15-Apr-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./2267/2026
Registration Date
25-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
Jharkhand Bovine Prohibition Of Slaughter Act, 2005 ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD SAFDAR QURAISHI
Adv. SHRAVAN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABIR KUMAR CHATTERJEE alias PRABIR CHATTERJEE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
Case Summary: A.B.A. /2267/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to MD Safdar Quraishi, who faced charges under the Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter) Act, 2005 and Prevention of Cruelty of Animal Act, 1960. The court found that the petitioner's name appeared only in the driver's confessional statement, he was not the vehicle owner, denied possession of the bovine animal, and had no criminal antecedents. The petitioner was directed to surrender within two weeks and granted bail upon furnishing Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
23-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./2267/2026
Case Summary: A.B.A. /2267/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to MD Safdar Quraishi, who faced charges under the Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter) Act, 2005 and Prevention of Cruelty of Animal Act, 1960. The court found that the petitioner's name appeared only in the driver's confessional statement, he was not the vehicle owner, denied possession of the bovine animal, and had no criminal antecedents. The petitioner was directed to surrender within two weeks and granted bail upon furnishing Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts