MD.DILSHAD ANSARI @ DILSHAD ANSARI @ DHELA vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ANURADHA SAHAY — A.B.A./2235/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),117(2),109,351(2),308(3),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010124332026

Filing Number

A.B.A./8069/2026

Filing Date

15-Apr-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./2235/2026

Registration Date

23-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 482 ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),117(2),109,351(2),308(3),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD.DILSHAD ANSARI @ DILSHAD ANSARI @ DHELA

    Adv. ROHIT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ANURADHA SAHAY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed petitioner Md. Dilshad Ansari's petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application before the trial court regarding Ormanjhi P.S. Case No. 222 of 2025. Both the petitioner's counsel and State's counsel consented to the withdrawal, and the court clarified that the trial court will decide any subsequent bail application on merits without prejudice to this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./2235/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed petitioner Md. Dilshad Ansari's petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application before the trial court regarding Ormanjhi P.S. Case No. 222 of 2025. Both the petitioner's counsel and State's counsel consented to the withdrawal, and the court clarified that the trial court will decide any subsequent bail application on merits without prejudice to this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case