KAILASH KUMAR ALAIS KAILASH GANJHU vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VISHWANATH ROY — A.B.A./2191/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 8,27(A),28,29,30,NDPS,ACT,33,IF,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010122692026
Filing Number
A.B.A./7964/2026
Filing Date
13-Apr-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./2191/2026
Registration Date
21-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
DRUGS & MEDICINES ( 125 )
Sub-Category
Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KAILASH KUMAR ALAIS KAILASH GANJHU
Adv. JEETENDRA KUMAR MISHRA,KUNAL,KUNAL, ,KUNAL
-
2.MAHINDRA GANJHU
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VISHWANATH ROY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Kailash Kumar Ganjhu and Mahindra Ganjhu, who faced charges under the NDPS Act and Indian Forest Act for alleged poppy cultivation on forest land. The court found that the disputed land belonged to the forest department rather than the petitioners and noted their clean criminal record, making them suitable for bail. They were directed to surrender within three weeks and released on bail of Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
30-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./2191/2026
The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Kailash Kumar Ganjhu and Mahindra Ganjhu, who faced charges under the NDPS Act and Indian Forest Act for alleged poppy cultivation on forest land. The court found that the disputed land belonged to the forest department rather than the petitioners and noted their clean criminal record, making them suitable for bail. They were directed to surrender within three weeks and released on bail of Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts