IIFL CAPITAL SERVICES LTD. THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE NAMELY DEEPAK KUMAR vs MRS. MEERA AGRAWAL — JHHC10122112026
Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
CNR: JHHC010122112026
Filing Number
C.M.P./4286/2026
Filing Date
13-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 20-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.IIFL CAPITAL SERVICES LTD. THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE NAMELY DEEPAK KUMAR
Adv. AKHOURI AWINASH KUMAR,ANKIT VISHAL,ANKIT VISHAL, ,SOUMA RANJAN MUKHERJEE,ASHWINI PRIYA,INDRAJIT SINHA,ANKIT VISHAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.MRS. MEERA AGRAWAL
-
2.SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (SEBI),
-
3.NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE OF INDIA LIMITED (NSE) EXCHANGE PLAZA
Case History
-
13-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand disposed of two consolidated petitions (C.M.P. Nos. 4286 and 4287 of 2026) filed by IIFL Capital Services Limited regarding arbitration matters. The court directed the In-Charge Judge to hear and decide the petitioner's stay applications in the underlying commercial appeals on 15.04.2026, either granting or rejecting them on merits, as the previous adjournments on the ground of the regular judge's deputation were unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
Orders
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
13-Apr-2026
Case filed
Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand disposed of two consolidated petitions (C.M.P. Nos. 4286 and 4287 of 2026) filed by IIFL Capital Services Limited regarding arbitration matters. The court directed the In-Charge Judge to hear and decide the petitioner's stay applications in the underlying commercial appeals on 15.04.2026, either granting or rejecting them on merits, as the previous adjournments on the ground of the regular judge's deputation were unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts