AHMAD ANSARI ALIAS AHMAD MIYA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABIR KUMAR CHATTERJEE alias PRABIR CHATTERJEE — A.B.A./2272/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 30(c),33,52,IF,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn on 07th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010121912026
Filing Number
A.B.A./7906/2026
Filing Date
10-Apr-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./2272/2026
Registration Date
25-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
FOREST ( 137 )
Sub-Category
Indian Forest Act ,1927 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AHMAD ANSARI ALIAS AHMAD MIYA
Adv. JAGAT KUMAR SONI,SANJEEV THAKUR,SANJEEV THAKUR, ,SHIVAM KUMAR JHA,SANJEEV THAKUR
-
2.MAKI JUDDIN MIYAN ALIAS MAFIJUDDIN ANSARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABIR KUMAR CHATTERJEE alias PRABIR CHATTERJEE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the application filed by Ahmad Ansari and Makijuddin Miyan as withdrawn, granting them liberty to file a regular bail application before the Chief Judicial Magistrate in the underlying complaint case (O.C.R. Case No. 725 of 2019). Both the petitioners' counsel and state counsel consented to the withdrawal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
23-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./2272/2026
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the application filed by Ahmad Ansari and Makijuddin Miyan as withdrawn, granting them liberty to file a regular bail application before the Chief Judicial Magistrate in the underlying complaint case (O.C.R. Case No. 725 of 2019). Both the petitioners' counsel and state counsel consented to the withdrawal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts