SHASHI KUMAR MAHTO vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUNIL KUMAR DUBEY — A.B.A./2281/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 316(2),318(4),338,329(4),331(2),336(3),3(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010121492026
Filing Number
A.B.A./7872/2026
Filing Date
10-Apr-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./2281/2026
Registration Date
25-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 482 ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHASHI KUMAR MAHTO
Adv. AWANISH SHEKHAR,ARUN KUMAR,ARUN KUMAR, ,PRAMOD KUMAR SHARMA,ARUN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUNIL KUMAR DUBEY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
Case Summary: A.B.A. 2281/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to Shashi Kumar Mahto, aged 20, who faced charges including cheating and criminal intimidation in a case involving Rs. 10.9 lakhs allegedly taken on false pretense of executing a sale deed. The court found that receipts on non-judicial stamp paper clearly showed the amount was received by the petitioner's father (Aseshwar Mahto), not the petitioner himself, establishing his false implication as an accomplice. The petitioner was directed to surrender within three weeks and was granted bail on furnishing Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
23-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./2281/2026
Case Summary: A.B.A. 2281/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to Shashi Kumar Mahto, aged 20, who faced charges including cheating and criminal intimidation in a case involving Rs. 10.9 lakhs allegedly taken on false pretense of executing a sale deed. The court found that receipts on non-judicial stamp paper clearly showed the amount was received by the petitioner's father (Aseshwar Mahto), not the petitioner himself, establishing his false implication as an accomplice. The petitioner was directed to surrender within three weeks and was granted bail on furnishing Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts