PRINCE KUMAR ALIAS PRINCE KUMAR BARNWAL vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - V.S.SAHAY — Cr.Rev./484/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 74/75,BNS,6,10,12,POCSO,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010121382026

Filing Number

Cr.Rev./7863/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

Cr.Rev./484/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )

Sub-Category

Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 74/75,BNS,6,10,12,POCSO,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRINCE KUMAR ALIAS PRINCE KUMAR BARNWAL

    Adv. YOGESH MODI,RUCHI MUKTI,RUCHI MUKTI, ,ANAM IQBAL,MAHIKA RANI,OMIYA ANUSHA,RUCHI MUKTI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - V.S.SAHAY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court dismissed Prince Kumar Barnwal's bail revision application in a case involving alleged sexual assault of an 11-year-old girl. The court rejected the petitioner's arguments about family enmity and investigative irregularities, finding the victim's BNSS statement credible and sufficiently corroborative of the allegations, thereby upholding the lower courts' bail rejection orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.Rev./484/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court dismissed Prince Kumar Barnwal's bail revision application in a case involving alleged sexual assault of an 11-year-old girl. The court rejected the petitioner's arguments about family enmity and investigative irregularities, finding the victim's BNSS statement credible and sufficiently corroborative of the allegations, thereby upholding the lower courts' bail rejection orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case