RAMAY MUNDA vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA — Cr.M.P./1310/2026

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 82,83,CrPC. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010121372026

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./7862/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

Cr.M.P./1310/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Quashing Matter ( 206 )

Sub-Category

Quashing of Order ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 82,83,CrPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMAY MUNDA

    Adv. ANIL KUMAR GANJHU,PRIYANKA KUMARI,PRIYANKA KUMARI, ,RANDHIR KUMAR SHARMA,PRIYANKA KUMARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Summary: In Cr.M.P. No. 1310/2026, the Jharkhand High Court adjourned the criminal miscellaneous petition filed by Ramay Munda against the State of Jharkhand. The petitioner's counsel requested additional time, which was granted by Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary as a final opportunity. The case has been listed for hearing after six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.M.P./1310/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Cr.M.P. No. 1310/2026, the Jharkhand High Court adjourned the criminal miscellaneous petition filed by Ramay Munda against the State of Jharkhand. The petitioner's counsel requested additional time, which was granted by Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary as a final opportunity. The case has been listed for hearing after six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case