XXX vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJNEESH VARDHAN — A.B.A./2246/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 76,109,BNS. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010120232026
Filing Number
A.B.A./7800/2026
Filing Date
10-Apr-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./2246/2026
Registration Date
24-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 482 ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.XXX
Adv. SHAILENDRA JIT
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJNEESH VARDHAN
-
2.VICTIM
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
Case Summary: A.B.A. No. 2246/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand rejected the petitioner's anticipatory bail plea in a case involving allegations of outraging modesty under Sections 76 and 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Although the petitioner's counsel argued false implication and family dispute, the court found direct allegations in the FIR and declined to grant anticipatory bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
10-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./2246/2026
Case Summary: A.B.A. No. 2246/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand rejected the petitioner's anticipatory bail plea in a case involving allegations of outraging modesty under Sections 76 and 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Although the petitioner's counsel argued false implication and family dispute, the court found direct allegations in the FIR and declined to grant anticipatory bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts