HIRAMAN GANJHU vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA — A.B.A./2299/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 8,27(a),28,29,30,NDPS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010119262026

Filing Number

A.B.A./7725/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./2299/2026

Registration Date

27-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

DRUGS & MEDICINES ( 125 )

Sub-Category

Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 8,27(a),28,29,30,NDPS,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HIRAMAN GANJHU

    Adv. VIKRAM SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Hiraman Ganjhu, accused of cultivating poppy plants on forest land under NDPS Act and Indian Forest Act provisions. The court found the allegations credible but granted bail because the land belonged to the Forest Department (not the petitioner), the petitioner had no criminal history, and four co-accused received identical relief in a related case. Ganjhu must surrender within three weeks and furnish a Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./2299/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Hiraman Ganjhu, accused of cultivating poppy plants on forest land under NDPS Act and Indian Forest Act provisions. The court found the allegations credible but granted bail because the land belonged to the Forest Department (not the petitioner), the petitioner had no criminal history, and four co-accused received identical relief in a related case. Ganjhu must surrender within three weeks and furnish a Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case