M/S B.K. CONSTRUCTION, THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR CHANDRA PRAKASH JAIN vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN, ,PRABHAT KR SINHA — WPC/3782/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010118412026

Filing Number

WPC/4164/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPC/3782/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

ADMITTED DUES ( 43 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S B.K. CONSTRUCTION, THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR CHANDRA PRAKASH JAIN

    Adv. VISHAL KUMAR RAI,HARSH LADIA,HARSH LADIA, ,HARSH LADIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN, ,PRABHAT KR SINHA

  2. 2.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER. HAZARIBAGH

  3. 3.CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, JHARKHAND STATE LIVELIHOOD PROMOTION SOCIETY (JSLPS), RURAL DEVELOPMENT

  4. 4.DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, HAZARIBAGH

  5. 5.CHAIRMAN ZILA PARISHAD

  6. 6.NARI SHAKTI AJIVIKA DIDI CAFE, THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    Case Summary: In WP(C) No.3782 of 2026 before the High Court of Jharkhand, M/s B.K. Construction petitioned against the State of Jharkhand and others. On 10.06.2026, Justice Ananda Sen adjourned the case to the following week at the petitioner's counsel's request, with no substantive orders passed on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/3782/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In WP(C) No.3782 of 2026 before the High Court of Jharkhand, M/s B.K. Construction petitioned against the State of Jharkhand and others. On 10.06.2026, Justice Ananda Sen adjourned the case to the following week at the petitioner's counsel's request, with no substantive orders passed on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case