GAUTAM KUMAR @ GAUTAM KUSHWAHA vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SAKET KUMAR — B.A./3864/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 87,BNS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010118102026
Filing Number
B.A./7667/2026
Filing Date
09-Apr-2026
Registration No
B.A./3864/2026
Registration Date
04-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GAUTAM KUMAR @ GAUTAM KUSHWAHA
Adv. DIWAKAR JHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SAKET KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: B.A. 3864/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Gautam Kumar, who had been in custody since December 2025 under Section 87 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly taking away a major victim. The court found the petitioner's submissions credible—noting the victim was a major, no witnesses had been examined, and the victim refused medical examination—and ordered his release on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties and conditions including mandatory court attendance and cooperation with proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
21-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3864/2026
Case Summary: B.A. 3864/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Gautam Kumar, who had been in custody since December 2025 under Section 87 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly taking away a major victim. The court found the petitioner's submissions credible—noting the victim was a major, no witnesses had been examined, and the victim refused medical examination—and ordered his release on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties and conditions including mandatory court attendance and cooperation with proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts