DHANESHWAR MAHTO vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KR MISHRA — Cr.Rev./448/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 138,NI,ACT,357(3),CrPC. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010117112026
Filing Number
Cr.Rev./7576/2026
Filing Date
08-Apr-2026
Registration No
Cr.Rev./448/2026
Registration Date
29-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 438 And 442 ( 17 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DHANESHWAR MAHTO
Adv. ATMA RAM CHAUDHARY,ANKUR ANAND,ANKUR ANAND, ,Ashish Kumar Verma,ANKUR ANAND
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KR MISHRA
-
2.SMT. GITA DEVI
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
Case Summary: Cr.Rev. 448/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand allowed the petitioner's interlocutory application to condone a 197-day delay in filing the revision petition. The court granted bail to Dhaneshwar Mahto, who has been in custody since March 14, 2026 for a Negotiable Instrument Act violation and has completed a substantial portion of his sentence. Bail was set at Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. Notice was issued to the opposite party with submissions due by June 11, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
08-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.Rev./448/2026
Case Summary: Cr.Rev. 448/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand allowed the petitioner's interlocutory application to condone a 197-day delay in filing the revision petition. The court granted bail to Dhaneshwar Mahto, who has been in custody since March 14, 2026 for a Negotiable Instrument Act violation and has completed a substantial portion of his sentence. Bail was set at Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. Notice was issued to the opposite party with submissions due by June 11, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts