MD NAJRUL ISHLAM ALIAS NAJRUL ISLAM vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VANDANA BHARTI, ,ABHAY KR MISHRA,KRISHNA PRAJAPATI,ANSHUMAN MISHRA,ADYA MISHRA — Cr.M.P./1132/2024
Case under An Application U/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 482. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010117032024
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
Cr.M.P./8477/2024
Filing Date
08-04-2024
Registration No
Cr.M.P./1132/2024
Registration Date
16-04-2024
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Quashing Matter ( 206 )
Sub-Category
Quashing of Order ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MD NAJRUL ISHLAM ALIAS NAJRUL ISLAM
Adv. GAUTAM KUMAR,SAVITA KUMARI,SAVITA KUMARI, ,KISMANTI MINJ,PUSHPANJALI KUMARI,AMRESH KUMAR SHARMA,SAVITA KUMARI
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VANDANA BHARTI, ,ABHAY KR MISHRA,KRISHNA PRAJAPATI,ANSHUMAN MISHRA,ADYA MISHRA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
LAWAZIMA
Admission
Admission
Admission
Admission
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-06-2024 | LAWAZIMA |
| 30-10-2025 | Admission |
| 16-10-2025 | Admission |
| 09-10-2025 | Admission |
| 25-09-2025 | Admission |
Orders
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No. 1132/2024 The High Court of Jharkhand allowed petitioner Md. Najrul Islam's interlocutory application to amend the criminal miscellaneous petition to include an additional prayer to quash the charge order dated 18.03.2026 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-I, Rajmahal. The petitioner was directed to file a consolidated amended petition within two weeks, failing which the original petition would stand dismissed. The case was then adjourned for listing after filing the consolidated petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No. 1132/2024 The High Court of Jharkhand allowed petitioner Md. Najrul Islam's interlocutory application to amend the criminal miscellaneous petition to include an additional prayer to quash the charge order dated 18.03.2026 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-I, Rajmahal. The petitioner was directed to file a consolidated amended petition within two weeks, failing which the original petition would stand dismissed. The case was then adjourned for listing after filing the consolidated petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts