BABLOO DAS vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KR MISHRA — A.B.A./2170/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 406,420,120B,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010116462026

Filing Number

A.B.A./7537/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./2170/2026

Registration Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 482 ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 406,420,120B,IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BABLOO DAS

    Adv. ANIL KUMAR GANJHU,PRIYANKA KUMARI,PRIYANKA KUMARI, ,RANDHIR KUMAR SHARMA,PRIYANKA KUMARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KR MISHRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    Summary of A.B.A. No. 2170/2026 Babloo Das, a field agent at Bharat Finance Inclusion Ltd., sought anticipatory bail in connection with FIR Case No. 82/2025 for allegedly collecting ₹27,24,199 from loan consumers but failing to deposit the funds in their accounts (IPC §406, 420, 120-B). Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi rejected the anticipatory bail petition, finding that the petitioner cheated both the company and consumers, and that the attending facts and circumstances did not warrant extending bail privilege. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./2170/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of A.B.A. No. 2170/2026 Babloo Das, a field agent at Bharat Finance Inclusion Ltd., sought anticipatory bail in connection with FIR Case No. 82/2025 for allegedly collecting ₹27,24,199 from loan consumers but failing to deposit the funds in their accounts (IPC §406, 420, 120-B). Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi rejected the anticipatory bail petition, finding that the petitioner cheated both the company and consumers, and that the attending facts and circumstances did not warrant extending bail privilege. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case