DINESH KUMAR YADAV vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VISHWANATH ROY — A.B.A./2006/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(I),303(2),109(I),(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010116002026

Filing Number

A.B.A./7512/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./2006/2026

Registration Date

13-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 482 ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(I),303(2),109(I),(5),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DINESH KUMAR YADAV

    Adv. SUSHANT KUMAR SINHA,KUMAR UDAYAN,KUMAR UDAYAN, ,KUMAR UDAYAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VISHWANATH ROY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to 19-year-old Dinesh Kumar Yadav, who faced charges under the NDPS Act and Indian Forest Act for alleged poppy cultivation. The court found that the disputed land belonged to the forest department rather than the petitioner, and noting his clean criminal record, granted bail on a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, requiring surrender within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./2006/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to 19-year-old Dinesh Kumar Yadav, who faced charges under the NDPS Act and Indian Forest Act for alleged poppy cultivation. The court found that the disputed land belonged to the forest department rather than the petitioner, and noting his clean criminal record, granted bail on a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, requiring surrender within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case