UMKESH UPADHYAY vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THRO THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY, Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN — WPC/3222/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010115762026

Filing Number

WPC/4070/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPC/3222/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UMKESH UPADHYAY

    Adv. PRAVEEN CHANDRA,ATUL RAI,ATUL RAI, ,ATUL RAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THRO THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY, Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN

  2. 2.DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, GOVT. OF JHARKHAND

  3. 3.DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, GARHWA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    Case Summary: WPC/3222/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand admitted the writ petition filed by Umkesh Upadhyay (and two related petitions) challenging a letter issued by the Department of School Education and Literacy. The Court directed respondents to file counter affidavits and granted interim protection by staying any coercive action against the petitioners pending final hearing. The cases were tagged together for consolidated consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/3222/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPC/3222/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand admitted the writ petition filed by Umkesh Upadhyay (and two related petitions) challenging a letter issued by the Department of School Education and Literacy. The Court directed respondents to file counter affidavits and granted interim protection by staying any coercive action against the petitioners pending final hearing. The cases were tagged together for consolidated consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case