KALI PRASAD SINGH vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ACB Advocate - VINEET KUMAR VASHISTHA, ,LAL CHANDRAHAS NATH SHAHEDEO — Cr.A(SJ)/366/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 406,409,419,420,423,424,467,468,471,120,B,/34,IPC,3(I),(v),/4,ST,SC,ACT. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010115402026
Filing Number
Cr.A(SJ)/7489/2026
Filing Date
07-Apr-2026
Registration No
Cr.A(SJ)/366/2026
Registration Date
17-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL RIGHTS ( 114 )
Sub-Category
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Preven.of Atrocities)Act,1989 ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KALI PRASAD SINGH
Adv. ABHIJEET KUMAR SINGH,SHAILESH KR SINGH,SHAILESH KR SINGH, ,ARPITA SINHA,PRAKHAR KUMAR VISHAIN,SHAILESH KR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ACB Advocate - VINEET KUMAR VASHISTHA, ,LAL CHANDRAHAS NATH SHAHEDEO
-
2.INDU SEKHAR JHA
Case History
-
23-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Jun-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
-
18-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
Case Summary: Cr.A(SJ)/366/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand admitted consolidated criminal appeals challenging detentions in vigilance cases. The Court criticized the State for failing to clearly identify specific crimes or victims under SC/ST (PoA) Act charges against multiple appellants, calling it "a serious matter." The Court granted provisional bail to appellant Kumari Ratnakar for one month (Rs. 10,000 with two sureties) on humanitarian grounds, as she has a seven-year-old disabled child requiring maternal care. Cases adjourned to 23.06.2026 for State's further submissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
-
12-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
-
14-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.A(SJ)/366/2026
Case Summary: Cr.A(SJ)/366/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand admitted consolidated criminal appeals challenging detentions in vigilance cases. The Court criticized the State for failing to clearly identify specific crimes or victims under SC/ST (PoA) Act charges against multiple appellants, calling it "a serious matter." The Court granted provisional bail to appellant Kumari Ratnakar for one month (Rs. 10,000 with two sureties) on humanitarian grounds, as she has a seven-year-old disabled child requiring maternal care. Cases adjourned to 23.06.2026 for State's further submissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts