SAKET KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KUMAR — A.B.A./1996/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 20(b)(ii)(B),25,29,30,NDPS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010115152026
Filing Number
A.B.A./7467/2026
Filing Date
07-Apr-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./1996/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
DRUGS & MEDICINES ( 125 )
Sub-Category
Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAKET KUMAR
Adv. NANDAN PRASAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Saket Kumar in an NDPS case (Sections 20(b)(ii)(B), 25, 29, 30) after finding his name appeared only in a co-accused's confessional statement and noting he had no criminal antecedents, particularly given that a co-accused received similar bail. The petitioner was directed to surrender within two weeks and be released on Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
27-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./1996/2026
The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Saket Kumar in an NDPS case (Sections 20(b)(ii)(B), 25, 29, 30) after finding his name appeared only in a co-accused's confessional statement and noting he had no criminal antecedents, particularly given that a co-accused received similar bail. The petitioner was directed to surrender within two weeks and be released on Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts