PRADIP YADAV vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - V.S.SAHAY, ,RAHUL RANJAN — A.B.A./2040/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(I),303(2),109(I),3(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010115132026
Filing Number
A.B.A./7466/2026
Filing Date
07-Apr-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./2040/2026
Registration Date
13-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 482 ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRADIP YADAV
Adv. LALIT YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - V.S.SAHAY, ,RAHUL RANJAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Pradip Yadav in a case involving assault charges arising from a free fight during a religious procession. The court found that liability was unclear given counter-cases existed and multiple persons were generically implicated. Yadav was directed to surrender within two weeks and granted bail of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, subject to BNSS 2023 conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
27-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./2040/2026
Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Pradip Yadav in a case involving assault charges arising from a free fight during a religious procession. The court found that liability was unclear given counter-cases existed and multiple persons were generically implicated. Yadav was directed to surrender within two weeks and granted bail of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, subject to BNSS 2023 conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts