ANUPA NAGERIA ALLIAS ANUPA NAGERIA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ABHAY KR TIWARI — Cr.A(DB)/527/2026

Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010115062026

Filing Number

Cr.A(DB)/7462/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

Cr.A(DB)/527/2026

Registration Date

24-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

National Investigation Agency Act ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANUPA NAGERIA ALLIAS ANUPA NAGERIA

    Adv. PRIYANKA AGRAWAL, ,SONAL PANDEY,NILESH KUMAR,AYUSH KUMAR VERMA,SONAL SODHANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ABHAY KR TIWARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay,hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar SrivastavaView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court allowed Anupa Nagesia's bail appeal, setting aside the Sessions Judge's rejection order. The court granted bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, considering that the appellant had been in custody since February 13, 2026, was not apprehended at the scene, and was implicated solely on disclosure by minor children intercepted by police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.A(DB)/527/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court allowed Anupa Nagesia's bail appeal, setting aside the Sessions Judge's rejection order. The court granted bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, considering that the appellant had been in custody since February 13, 2026, was not apprehended at the scene, and was implicated solely on disclosure by minor children intercepted by police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case