ASHOK MURMU vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAKESH RANJAN — A.B.A./2131/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 69,351(2),352,BNS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010114162026
Filing Number
A.B.A./7410/2026
Filing Date
07-Apr-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./2131/2026
Registration Date
17-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 482 ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHOK MURMU
Adv. RAHUL RANJAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAKESH RANJAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
Case Summary: A.B.A. /2131/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to Ashok Murmu, aged 23, who faced charges under Sections 69, 351(2), and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for alleged cheating on false marriage pretext. The court found prima facie evidence that the relationship between petitioner and informant since 2020 was consensual in nature, particularly noting the informant lived in his house for six months. Petitioner was directed to surrender within three weeks and granted bail upon furnishing Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
29-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./2131/2026
Case Summary: A.B.A. /2131/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to Ashok Murmu, aged 23, who faced charges under Sections 69, 351(2), and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for alleged cheating on false marriage pretext. The court found prima facie evidence that the relationship between petitioner and informant since 2020 was consensual in nature, particularly noting the informant lived in his house for six months. Petitioner was directed to surrender within three weeks and granted bail upon furnishing Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts