SHANKAR BHARTI vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABIR KUMAR CHATTERJEE alias PRABIR CHATTERJEE — A.B.A./2165/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 33(1)(c),IF,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010113542026

Filing Number

A.B.A./7368/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./2165/2026

Registration Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 482 ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 33(1)(c),IF,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHANKAR BHARTI

    Adv. MANISH YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABIR KUMAR CHATTERJEE alias PRABIR CHATTERJEE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Shankar Bharti, who faced charges under Section 33(1)(c) of the Indian Forest Act for allegedly cultivating poppy plants on forest land. The court found that Bharti's name appeared in the FIR only on suspicion, the land did not belong to him, and he had no criminal history. Bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, conditional on surrender within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./2165/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Shankar Bharti, who faced charges under Section 33(1)(c) of the Indian Forest Act for allegedly cultivating poppy plants on forest land. The court found that Bharti's name appeared in the FIR only on suspicion, the land did not belong to him, and he had no criminal history. Bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, conditional on surrender within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case