RAHUL KUMAR RAM ALLIAS RAHUL KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VINEET KUMAR VASHISTHA — B.A./3831/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 310(2),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010113132026
Filing Number
B.A./7345/2026
Filing Date
06-Apr-2026
Registration No
B.A./3831/2026
Registration Date
02-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAHUL KUMAR RAM ALLIAS RAHUL KUMAR
Adv. AARYAMANN RELAN, ,ANKIT APURVA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VINEET KUMAR VASHISTHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand granted regular bail to 19-year-old Rahul Kumar Ram, accused of dacoity under Section 310(2) BNS 2023, finding merit in the petitioner's argument that he was not named in the FIR but charged without being placed on TI Parade. The court released him on Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties and conditions including cooperation with trial, non-interference with witnesses, and furnishing contact details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
17-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3831/2026
The High Court of Jharkhand granted regular bail to 19-year-old Rahul Kumar Ram, accused of dacoity under Section 310(2) BNS 2023, finding merit in the petitioner's argument that he was not named in the FIR but charged without being placed on TI Parade. The court released him on Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties and conditions including cooperation with trial, non-interference with witnesses, and furnishing contact details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts