HARJIT SINGH vs PURAN CHANDRA PUTRTY And ORS. Advocate - SHARIF HOSSAIN, ,SHEKHAR KUMAR,SHEKHAR KUMAR,BIBHASH SINHA,BIBHASH SINHA,SHEKHAR KUMAR,BIBHASH SINHA,BIBHASH SINHA,SHEKHAR KUMAR,RAKESH KUMAR TRIVEDY,ZAID IMAM — SA/111/2006

Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 01-Oct-2016

CNR: JHHC010113042006

Filing Number

SA/9185/2006

Filing Date

05-May-2006

Registration No

SA/111/2006

Registration Date

05-May-2006

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Category

CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

Appeal Under Section 100 Cpc ( 27 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARJIT SINGH

    Adv. ROHIT ROY,KAUSHIK SARKHEL,KAUSHIK SARKHEL, ,INDRAJIT SINHA,KAUSHIK SARKHEL,ANJAL RAJ,ANJAL RAJ,KAUSHIK SARKHEL,INDRAJIT SINHA,KAUSHIK SARKHEL,ANJAL RAJ,INDRAJIT SINHA,ANJAL RAJ,INDRAJIT SINHA,KAUSHIK SARKHEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PURAN CHANDRA PUTRTY And ORS. Advocate - SHARIF HOSSAIN, ,SHEKHAR KUMAR,SHEKHAR KUMAR,BIBHASH SINHA,BIBHASH SINHA,SHEKHAR KUMAR,BIBHASH SINHA,BIBHASH SINHA,SHEKHAR KUMAR,RAKESH KUMAR TRIVEDY,ZAID IMAM

  2. 2.Deputy Commissioner

  3. 3.Guru Tui

  4. 4.Baljit Singh

  5. 5.Kala Singh

  6. 6.Dalbir Singh

  7. 7.Jogendar

  8. 8.Dalbira

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF

    Summary of SA/111/2006 - High Court of Jharkhand Court's Decision: The High Court allowed the appeal filed by defendant Harjit Singh, reversing the first appellate court's judgment that had granted plaintiff Puran Chandra Putry a 1/18th share in tribal communal property. The court found the appellate judgment exceeded its authority by determining the plaintiff's share without proving prior partition, and held that the plaintiff failed to establish superior title against a 1961 registered sale deed to a co-sharer. Key Reasoning: The court determined the appellate court impermissibly went beyond pleadings in awarding a fractional share without the other co-sharers being parties. Critically, the court found the 1961 registered sale deed executed by Bamia Ho (son of Ranku Ho, a descendant of original tenant Chhota Pandu Ho) to Sumi Kui was validly executed—the plaintiff's own witness corroborated this. Since the property was already sold in 1961, the plaintiff's 1990 purchase from another descendant conveyed no additional rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  5. 02-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  10. 27-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF

  11. 27-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF

  12. 27-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF

  13. 14-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  14. 05-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  15. 26-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  16. 06-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  17. 16-Aug-2022

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  18. 02-Aug-2022

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  19. 16-Jun-2022

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  20. 25-Oct-2019

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  21. 18-Oct-2019

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  22. 11-Oct-2019

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  23. 27-Sep-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 05-May-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/111/2006

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of SA/111/2006 - High Court of Jharkhand Court's Decision: The High Court allowed the appeal filed by defendant Harjit Singh, reversing the first appellate court's judgment that had granted plaintiff Puran Chandra Putry a 1/18th share in tribal communal property. The court found the appellate judgment exceeded its authority by determining the plaintiff's share without proving prior partition, and held that the plaintiff failed to establish superior title against a 1961 registered sale deed to a co-sharer. Key Reasoning: The court determined the appellate court impermissibly went beyond pleadings in awarding a fractional share without the other co-sharers being parties. Critically, the court found the 1961 registered sale deed executed by Bamia Ho (son of Ranku Ho, a descendant of original tenant Chhota Pandu Ho) to Sumi Kui was validly executed—the plaintiff's own witness corroborated this. Since the property was already sold in 1961, the plaintiff's 1990 purchase from another descendant conveyed no additional rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case