DR. RAKESH KUMAR TARUN vs ANITA KUMARI Advocate - HEMANT KR SHIKARWAR, ,ADARSH KUMAR,AMAN DEEP,PRIYANKA,ABHISHEK KUMAR — FA/133/2025

Case under An Appeal U/s 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 Section 19(1). Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

CNR: JHHC010112652025

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

FA/3644/2025

Filing Date

03-04-2025

Registration No

FA/133/2025

Registration Date

06-08-2025

Judge

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD

Coram

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

FAMILY MATTERS ( 132 )

Sub-Category

Family Courts Act, 1984 ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Acts & Sections

An Appeal U/s 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 Section 19(1)

Petitioner(s)

DR. RAKESH KUMAR TARUN

Adv. PANKAJ SRIVASTAVA,ANITA SINHA,ANITA SINHA, ,MANISH KUMAR,ANITA SINHA

Respondent(s)

ANITA KUMARI Advocate - HEMANT KR SHIKARWAR, ,ADARSH KUMAR,AMAN DEEP,PRIYANKA,ABHISHEK KUMAR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD

15-07-2025

LAWAZIMA

22-08-2025

Admission

11-06-2026

Admission

05-05-2026

Admission

04-05-2026

Admission

Orders

05-05-2026
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD

Case Summary: FA No. 133/2025 Outcome: Case adjourned to 11.06.2026. The High Court of Jharkhand rejected the appellant-husband's settlement offer of Rs. 40,00,000 as a one-time payment for alimony and children's education/marriage expenses, which the respondent-wife did not accept. The court directed both parties to file affidavits and recalled trial court records to properly determine alimony obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FA No. 133/2025 Outcome: Case adjourned to 11.06.2026. The High Court of Jharkhand rejected the appellant-husband's settlement offer of Rs. 40,00,000 as a one-time payment for alimony and children's education/marriage expenses, which the respondent-wife did not accept. The court directed both parties to file affidavits and recalled trial court records to properly determine alimony obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case