PARSHURAM PASWAN vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ANURADHA SAHAY — A.B.A./2247/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 62,352,351(2),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010112422026
Filing Number
A.B.A./7297/2026
Filing Date
06-Apr-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./2247/2026
Registration Date
24-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 482 ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PARSHURAM PASWAN
Adv. SHEO KUMAR SINGH,RAJ NANDAN CHATTERJEE,RAJ NANDAN CHATTERJEE, ,NISHAD KHAN,DIKSHA RANI,JUHI KUMARI,PRIYA SAW,VISHWAJEET KUMAR TIWARI,RAJ NANDAN CHATTERJEE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ANURADHA SAHAY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Parshuram Paswan, who was accused under Sections 69, 352, and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for allegedly establishing a physical relationship with the informant under false pretense of marriage. The court found that the FIR itself indicated the petitioner and informant had been in a consensual relationship for two years before the complaint was filed, suggesting the acts were consensual in nature. Paswan was directed to surrender within three weeks and granted bail of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
22-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./2247/2026
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Parshuram Paswan, who was accused under Sections 69, 352, and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for allegedly establishing a physical relationship with the informant under false pretense of marriage. The court found that the FIR itself indicated the petitioner and informant had been in a consensual relationship for two years before the complaint was filed, suggesting the acts were consensual in nature. Paswan was directed to surrender within three weeks and granted bail of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts