NIRANJAN MANDAL vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KR MISHRA — B.A./3500/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 316(2),318(4),111,BNS,66(C),66(D),IT,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010112222026
Filing Number
B.A./7287/2026
Filing Date
06-Apr-2026
Registration No
B.A./3500/2026
Registration Date
23-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Information Technology Act, 2000 ( 208 )
Sub-Category
Cyber Crime ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NIRANJAN MANDAL
Adv. PRATHIK,VINITA PRAKASH,VINITA PRAKASH, ,RITU RAJ,PRATIK SINGH,ARVIND KUMAR CHOUDHARY,ABHISHEK KUMAR MISHRA,Shambhu Nath Tiwari,RANJAN PANDIT,VINITA PRAKASH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KR MISHRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Niranjan Mandal, who was in custody since January 29, 2026, for offences under BNS 2023 and Information Technology Act sections. The court allowed the bail petition on finding the petitioner had no criminal antecedent, no identified victim, and similarly situated co-accused had already been granted bail, ordering him to furnish Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties and comply with specified conditions including regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
18-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
-
18-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3500/2026
The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Niranjan Mandal, who was in custody since January 29, 2026, for offences under BNS 2023 and Information Technology Act sections. The court allowed the bail petition on finding the petitioner had no criminal antecedent, no identified victim, and similarly situated co-accused had already been granted bail, ordering him to furnish Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties and comply with specified conditions including regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts