SHAMIM AKHTAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUNIL KUMAR DUBEY, ,SANJAY KUMAR PANDEY — Cr.M.P./987/2026
Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 3(1),(r)(s),(x)(y)(za),(zc),SC,ST,(POA),ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 05th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010111822026
Filing Number
Cr.M.P./7263/2026
Filing Date
06-04-2026
Registration No
Cr.M.P./987/2026
Registration Date
10-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL RIGHTS ( 114 )
Sub-Category
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Preven.of Atrocities)Act,1989 ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHAMIM AKHTAR
Adv. MAHESH TEWARI,SHWETANG KUMAR TIWARI,SHWETANG KUMAR TIWARI, ,SANJAY KUMAR SAW,SHWETANG KUMAR TIWARI
SHAHID SHEKH
MD. SHAMSIR ALAM @ SHAMSIR SHEKH @ MOLVI
SAFARUL SHEKH
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUNIL KUMAR DUBEY, ,SANJAY KUMAR PANDEY
KALPANA PAHARIN
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Fresh Filing (Admission)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Fresh Filing (Admission) |
Orders
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No. 987/2026 The Jharkhand High Court quashed criminal proceedings against three petitioners under Barharwa P.S. Case No. 79 of 2025, which involved charges under the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act and various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found the case involved a private dispute with civil flavour where the parties had reached complete settlement and compromise, making conviction remote and continuation of proceedings an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No. 987/2026 The Jharkhand High Court quashed criminal proceedings against three petitioners under Barharwa P.S. Case No. 79 of 2025, which involved charges under the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act and various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found the case involved a private dispute with civil flavour where the parties had reached complete settlement and compromise, making conviction remote and continuation of proceedings an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts